Diferença entre SYBR Green é Taqman

1. Mullis KB. The unusual origin of the polymerase chain reaction. Sci Am. 1990;262:56–61. 64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Mullis KB, Faloona FA. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:335–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Tan X, Sun X, Gonzalez-Crussi FX, Gonzalez-Crussi F, Hsueh W. PAF and TNF increase the precursor of NF-kappa B p50 mRNA in mouse intestine: Quantitative analysis by competitive PCR. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1215:157–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Huang SK, Xiao HQ, Kleine-Tebbe J, Paciotti G, Marsh DG, Lichtenstein LM, et al. IL-13 expression at the sites of allergen challenge in patients with asthma. J Immunol. 1995;155:2688–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Huang SK, Yi M, Palmer E, Marsh DG. A dominant T cell receptor beta-chainin response to a short ragweed allergen, Amb a 5. J Immunol. 1995;154:6157–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Manzin A, Solforosi L, Bianchi D, Gabrielli A, Giostra F, Bruno S, et al. Viral load in samples from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with various clinical conditions. Res Virol. 1995;146:279–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Connor RI, Mohri H, Cao Y, Ho DD. Increased viral burden and cytopathicity correlate temporally with CD4+T-lymphocyte decline and clinical progression in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals. J Virol. 1993;67:1772–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Piatak M, Jr, Saag MS, Yang LC, Clark SJ, Kappes JC, Luk KC, et al. High levels of HIV-1 in plasma during all stages of infection determined by competitive PCR. Science. 1993;259:1749–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Furtado MR, Kingsley LA, Wolinsky SM. Changes in the viral mRNA expression pattern correlate with a rapid rate of CD4+T-cell number decline in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals. J Virol. 1995;69:2092–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, Williams PM. Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res. 1996;6:986–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Rossi JJ. Capture, mutate, quantitate: Variations of a central PCR scheme. Genet Anal Tech Appl. 1992;9:101–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Alyapkina YS, Romanova YM, Alekseeva NV, Kovalev YN, Gaintseva AV, Gintsburg AL. Development of a quantitative PCR technique and its application to the evaluation of gene expression. Russ J Genet. 2000;36:821–5. [Google Scholar]

13. Raeymaekers L. A commentary on the practical applications of competitive PCR. Genome Res. 1995;5:91–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Ferre F. Quantitative or semi-quantitative PCR: Reality versus myth. PCR Methods Appl. 1992;2:1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Fasco MJ, Treanor CP, Spivack S, Figge HL, Kaminsky LS. Quantitative RNA-polymerase chain reaction-DNA analysis by capillary electrophoresis and laser-induced fluorescence. Anal Biochem. 1995;224:140–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Lazar JG. Advanced methods in PCR product detection. PCR Methods Appl. 1994;4:S1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Valasek MA, Repa JJ. The power of real-time PCR. Adv Physiol Educ. 2005;29:151–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis KB, Horn GT, Erlich HA, et al. Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science. 1985;230:1350–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Higuchi R, Fockler C, Dollinger G, Watson R. Kinetic PCR analysis: Real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Biotechnology (N Y) 1993;11:1026–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Klein D. Quantification using real-time PCR technology: Applications and limitations. Trends Mol Med. 2002;8:257–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Orlando C, Pinzani P, Pazzagli M. Developments in quantitative PCR. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1998;36:255–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Wong ML, Medrano JF. Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation. Biotechniques. 2005;39:75–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Wittwer CT, Herrmann MG, Moss AA, Rasmussen RP. Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. Biotechniques. 1997;22:130–1. 134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Mackay IM. Real-time PCR in the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:190–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Wilhelm J, Pingoud A, Hahn M. Real-time PCR-based method for the estimation of genome sizes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:e56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Apte A, Daniel S. PCR primer design. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2009. 2009 pdb.ip65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Page 2

Background

Small molecules that bind to double-stranded DNA can be divided into two classes:

• Intercalators
• Minor-groove binders

Regardless of the binding method, there are two requirements for a DNA binding dye for real-time detection of PCR:

• Increased fluorescence when bound to double-stranded DNA
• No inhibition of PCR

We have developed conditions that permit the use of the SYBR Green I dye in PCR with little PCR inhibition and increased sensitivity of detection compared to ethidium bromide. Additionally, we have newer SYBR Green dyes that fluoresce more brightly and inhibit PCR less than the original SYBR Green I.

How SYBR dye chemistry works

SYBR dye detects polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products by binding to double-stranded DNA formed during PCR. Here’s how it works:

Step-by-step process

1. When SYBR dye is added to a sample, it immediately binds to all double-stranded DNA present in the sample.
2. During PCR, DNA polymerase amplifies the target sequence which creates the PCR products.
3. SYBR dye then binds to each new copy of double-stranded DNA.
4. As the PCR progresses, more PCR product is created. SYBR® dye binds to all double-stranded DNA, so the result is an increase in fluorescence intensity proportioned to the amount of PCR product produced.

Advantages of SYBR dye

• It can be used to monitor the amplification of any double-stranded DNA sequence.
• No probe is required, which can reduce assay setup and running costs, assuming that your PCR primers are well designed and your reaction is well characterized.

Disadvantage of SYBR dye

The primary disadvantage is that it may generate false positive signals; i.e., because the SYBR dye binds to any double-stranded DNA, it can also bind to nonspecific double-stranded DNA sequences. Therefore, it is extremely important to have well-designed primers that do not amplify non-target sequences, and that melt curve analysis be performed.

Additional consideration

Another aspect of using DNA binding dyes is that multiple dye molecules may bind to a single amplified DNA molecule. A consequence of multiple dye binding is that the amount of signal is dependent on the mass of double-stranded DNA produced in the reaction. Thus, if the amplification efficiencies are the same, amplification of a longer product will generate more signal than a shorter one. This is in contrast to the use of a fluorogenic probe, in which a single fluorophore is released from quenching for each amplified molecule synthesized, regardless of its length.