When auditing the valuation assertion of an equity method investment, which of the following is the auditor most likely to do ?

Auditing investments is important, especially when an auditee has large balances. Below I provide a comprehensive look at how you can audit investments effectively and efficiently.

The complexity of auditing investments varies. For entities with simple investment instruments, auditing is easy. Your main audit procedure might be to confirm balances. Complex investments, however, require additional work such as auditing values. As investment complexity increases, so will your need for stronger audit team members (those that understand unusual investments). Regardless, you need an audit methodology.

In this post, we will take a look at:

• Primary investment assertions
• Investment walkthroughs
• Directional risk for investments
• Primary risks for investments
• Common investment control deficiencies
• Risk of material misstatement for investments
• Substantive procedures for investments
• Common investment work papers

Primary Investments Assertions

First, let’s look at assertions.

Primary relevant assertions for investments include:

• Existence
• Accuracy
• Valuation
• Cutoff

The audit client is asserting that the investment balances exist, that they are accurate and properly valued, and that only investment activity within the period is recorded. 

While investment balances in the financial statements are important, disclosures are also vital, especially when the entity owns complex instruments. 

Investment Walkthroughs

Second, perform your risk assessment work in light of the relevant assertions.

As you perform walkthroughs of investments, you normally look for ways that investments might be overstated (though investments can be understated as well). You are asking, “What can go wrong?” whether intentionally or by mistake. You want to know if:

• The controls were appropriately designed, and 
• The controls were implemented (in use)

Walkthrough Questions

In performing investment walkthroughs, ask questions such as:

• What types of investments are owned?
• Are there any unusual investments? If yes, how are they valued?
• Is a specialist used to determine investment values?
• Who determines the classification of investments (e.g., trading, available for sale, held to maturity) and how
• Do the persons accounting for investment activity have sufficient knowledge to do so?
• Are timely investment reconciliations performed by competent personnel?
• Are all investment accounts reconciled (from the investment statements to the general ledger)?
• Who reconciles the investment accounts and when?
• Are the reconciliations reviewed by a second person?
• Are all investment accounts on the general ledger?
• How does the entity ensure that all investment activity is included in the general ledger (appropriate cutoff)?
• Who has the ability to transfer investment funds and what are the related controls?
• Is there appropriate segregation of duties for:
  • Persons that record investments, 
  • Persons that buy and sell investments, and
  • Persons that reconcile the investment statements
• What investment accounts were opened in the period?
• What investment accounts were closed in the period? 
• Who has the authority to open or close investment accounts?
• Are there any investment restrictions (externally or internally)?
• What persons are authorized to buy and sell investments?
• Does the entity have a written investment policy? 
• Does the company use an investment advisor? If yes, how often does management interact with the advisor? How are investment fees determined?
• Are there any investment impairments?
• Who is responsible for investment disclosures and do they have sufficient knowledge to carry out this duty?
• Are there any cost or equity-method investments?

As we ask questions, we also inspect documents (e.g., investment statements) and make observations (e.g., who reconciles the investment statements to the general ledger?).

If control weaknesses exist, we create audit procedures to address them. For example, if during the walkthrough we note that there are improperly classified investments, then will plan audit procedures to address that risk.

Directional Risk for Investments

Third, consider the directional risk of investments.

The directional risk for investments is that they are overstated. So, in performing your audit procedures, perform procedures to ensure that balances are properly stated.

Primary Risks for Investments

Fourth, think about the risks related to investments.

Primary risks include:

1. Investments are stolen
2. Investments are intentionally overstated to cover up theft
3. Investments accounts are intentionally omitted from the general ledger
4. Investments are misstated due to errors in the investment reconciliations 
5. Investments are improperly valued due to their complexity and management’s lack of accounting knowledge
6. Investments are misstated due to improper cutoff
7. Investment disclosures are not accurate or complete

Common Investment Control Deficiencies

Fifth, think about control deficiencies noted during your walkthroughs and other risk assessment work.

It is common to have the following investment control deficiencies:

• One person buys and sells investments, records those transactions, and reconciles the investment activity
• The person overseeing investment accounting does not possess sufficient knowledge or skill to properly perform the duty
• Investment reconciliations are not performed timely or improperly
• The company does not employ sufficient assistance in valuing complex assets such as hedges or alternative investments

Risk of Material Misstatement for Investments

Sixth, now its time to assess your risks.

In my smaller audit engagements, I usually assess control risk at high for each assertion. (You may, however, assess control risk at less than high, provided your walkthrough reveals that controls are appropriately designed and that they were implemented. If control risk is assessed at below high, you must test controls for effectiveness to support the lower risk assessment.)

When control risk is assessed at high, inherent risk becomes the driver of the risk of material misstatement (control risk X inherent risk = risk of material misstatement). For example, if control risk is high and inherent risk is moderate, then my RMM is moderate. 

The assertions that concern me the most are existence, accuracy, valuation, and cutoff.

The assertions that concern me the most are existence, accuracy, valuation, and cutoff. So my RMM for these assertions is usually moderate to high.

My response to higher risk assessments is to perform certain substantive procedures: namely, confirming investments, testing investment reconciliations, testing values, and vetting investment disclosures.

Substantive Procedures for Investments

And finally, it’s time to determine your substantive procedures in light of your identified risks.

My customary audit tests include:

1. Confirming investment balances agreeing them to the general ledger
2. Inspecting period-end activity for proper cutoff
3. Using an investment specialist to value complex instruments (if any)
4. Vetting investment disclosures with a current disclosure checklist

I don’t normally test controls related to investments. If controls are tested and you determine they are effective, then some of the substantive procedures may not be necessary. 

Common Investment Work Papers

My investments work papers normally include the following:

• An understanding of investment-related internal controls 
• Risk assessment of investments at the assertion level
• Documentation of any control deficiencies
• Investment audit program
• Investment reconciliations 
• Investment confirmations
• Valuations performed by specialists
• Documentation of the specialist’s experience, competence, and objectivity
• Disclosure checklist

Auditing Investments - A Simple Summary

• The primary relevant investment assertions include existence, accuracy, valuation, and cutoff
• Perform a walkthrough of investments by making inquiries, inspecting documents, and making observations
• The directional risk for investments is an overstatement
• Primary risks for investments include:
  • Investments are stolen
  • Investments are intentionally overstated to cover up theft
  • Investments accounts are intentionally omitted from the general ledger
  • Investments are misstated due to errors in the investment reconciliations
  • Investments are improperly valued due to their complexity and management’s lack of accounting knowledge
  • Investments are misstated due to improper cutoff
  • Investments disclosures are not accurate or complete
• The substantive procedures for investments should be responsive to the identified risks; common procedures include:
  • Confirming investments 
  • Inspecting period-end activity for proper cutoff
  • Using an investment specialist to value complex instruments 
  • Vetting investment disclosures with a current disclosure checklist

Now you know how to audit investments. 

See my next post regarding how to audit payables and expenses.

This post is a part of my series The Why and How of Auditing. Check my other posts.

Get my free accounting and auditing digest with the latest content.

Thanks for joining me here at CPA Scribo. Charles Hall

Charles Hall is a practicing CPA and Certified Fraud Examiner. For the last thirty years, he has primarily audited governments, nonprofits, and small businesses. He is the author of The Little Book of Local Government Fraud Prevention and Preparation of Financial Statements & Compilation Engagements. He frequently speaks at continuing education events. Charles is the quality control partner for McNair, McLemore, Middlebrooks & Co. where he provides daily audit and accounting assistance to over 65 CPAs. In addition, he consults with other CPA firms, assisting them with auditing and accounting issues.